In
his article “Seeing the Text”, Stephen Bernhardt hopes to show readers and
writers that making a text visually appealing can change a message and alter
appreciation for a text. He argues that fonts, color, graphics, and other
visual aspects can really have an effect on how an individual reads and
understands a text.
This
article is very similar to the article “Vocabulary of Comics” in the McCloud
uses a comic to visually show readers what he is talking about. The articles
differ in that their messages aren’t the same. In “Vocabulary of Comics”
McCloud is showing us HOW things represent objects, whereas Bernhardt is
showing us what representing objects can do for us.
I
found this article very interesting. Before I read this article I never thought
to change my font from Cambria to anything different when writing something not
for personal use. Now I see that changing font, font size, color, etc., can
actually be useful in sending a message, and how the message is received.
Before You Read
It
is hard to look at a written article and not read it. I am writing this before
I have read the Framing the Reading section and I can see two pictures, some
indents, titles, and a heading (the number 1).
Questions for Discussion and Journaling
3.)
I
do feel like I am writing the same paper repeatedly. Writing always seems so
formulaic to me and each research paper always seems like the same process. If
I add visual clues this will stop because my writing will no longer feel like a
list of facts, but more like a collaboration of facts to create a well-written
paper. Bernhardt would recommend I do this by leading the reader instead of
showing the reader.
Applying and Exploring Ideas
2.)
Changing
the font can have a profound effect on a paper. If I change the font to a bold,
heavy font, the paper seems to come off as aggressive. If the font is changed
to Comic Sans though, the paper comes off as annoying (I hate comic sans). When
typing in Cambria, what is being used now, the paper doesn’t necessarily seem
boring, but it does seem formal and informational.
After You Read
Scott
McCloud would have represented Bernhardt’s argument perfectly, as visual
elements are obviously and extremely important in comics/cartoons. McCloud
would have drawn out pictures and used different fonts and font sized to show
the reader information visually.
Meta Moment
To
me the most appropriate time to visually think about a text is when the text is
about something physical, which is just what seems natural to me. The writing
assignment for this course that calls for the most visual thinking about
presentation of text would be project #2.
No comments:
Post a Comment