In
her article, “Helping Students Use Textual Sources Persuasively”, Margaret
Kantz attempts to get students to use creativity when researching to debate
facts and learn to develop a unique, original argument. She argues that facts
are not always true and are used in order to get readers to see things in a
certain light.
This
reading is similar to the article “What Is It We Do When We Write Articles Like
This One – and How Can We Get Students to Join Us?” in that both articles the
author is trying to get the audience to see that creativity is a very important
factor in writing.
Getting Ready to Read
A
fact is something that is proven to be true and will always be true. A claim is
something that someone says to be true but has not yet been proven. An opinion
is an idea that someone has on a particular subject. An argument is a debate
over a particular subject between two people with different opinions, usually
backed up by facts.
Questions for
Discussion and Journaling
1.)
Kantz
states that facts are claims that an audience will accept and not need proof,
although they may want explanations. Opinions are given to an audience who will
then ask for proof and take that proof then make their own decision on whether
to believe it or not. Kantz says that arguments are things that need debating;
one would argue facts over specific things.
2.)
The
main thing that I got out of Kantz’ article is that many people will read
something and will accept it as truth. Kantz says that you need to understand
that facts are debatable and use this to come up with your own, original
argument. I never have done this before, which is probably a bad thing. I
always accepted my textbooks as truth. Why argue ‘the facts’? Kantz has changed
my mind on this now.
Applying and
Exploring Ideas
2.)
Prior
to class I thought that research and creativity were completely separate. As I
said above, I would always accept text as truth when I would research. I always
felt as if I was taught this in school before now; read, transcribe, and put it
on the teacher’s desk. Kantz says that you need to think creatively to
research, to come up with your own arguments. I really can’t see these two
ideas overlapping as I never put creativity in the same category as research.
Meta Moment
Kantz
is trying to analyze the construct of research being an activity that requires
only fact, and fact is unarguable. It would be useful to understand her
findings and claims because she explains that researching requires us to be
creative so we can come up with our own ideas and original arguments on our
topic of research. With this we can then come up with a more developed, unique
paper.
Hey Cy,
ReplyDeleteThis is pretty good work, and you're meeting all of the elements of the assignment. Except for the final one. Look back at the assignment sheet and make sure you get a "personal response" in here. I also think there are places where you could dig a little deeper. Kantz goes beyond just arguing for creative usage of sources. What specific strategies does she suggest? How does she use the composite student Shirley as a way of illustrating her arguments? You need to think about the "reasons" she uses to support her argument and come up with a clearer understanding of what she thinks we should actually do when we put sources in conversation with each other.